P.R Transport Agency V. Union of India (2005): Case Comment - Indian Legal Solution
indianlegalsolution.com/p-r-transport-agency-v-union-of-india-2005-case-comment/
1 Users
0 Comments
3 Highlights
0 Notes
Tags
Top Highlights
According to Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the parties cannot bar the jurisdiction of civil courts which has been created by a statute but where various civil court has been conferred with territorial jurisdiction by a statute then parties may limit itself to one or more such civil courts by agreement and this would not be violative of Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act.
Article 226 of the Constitution are similar to the extent that they permit the exercise of territorial jurisdiction where the cause of action arises in full or in part within their territories.
The most important difference is that the High Court has the power to act suo moto, to issue writs, order or directions while the civil court cannot act suo moto
Ready to highlight and find good content?
Glasp is a social web highlighter that people can highlight and organize quotes and thoughts from the web, and access other like-minded people’s learning.