The West interprets any self-restraint on Moscow's part in the war as weakness.
if the rules only exist for one side, and simply do not exist for the West, let alone for the Kiev obsessives, then it is no longer about rules.
A language that only one participant in the dialogue understands serves no purpose. After all, no one inside the country needs or understands these rules.
Simply threatening that we will respond if necessary, and that we have what we need, is clearly not enough. We have to respond. If we have what we need, now is the time. But if we have nothing, we can do it - do it or find something. Preferably difficult, targeted and very frightening. There is no cure for anger. We must proceed from this. Crimea will be attacked and so will our old territories. They are already attacking. We will not reach the West yet. Still the question of the TNWs and NSNWs. This is the last topic. Not the penultimate. But there is something we can do against the madmen. I think this is a case where if we can do it, we will do it. Otherwise, our threats are becoming too light. We are holding the front, and thanks to the heroic efforts of our men, it is difficult, but we are holding, and the enemy's losses are huge, but something else is needed here. It would be better if it were sharp, unexpected, hard and fatal for the enemy. Victory is above any rule, which in our situation makes no sense. And nothing less than Victory will satisfy us.
Glasp is a social web highlighter that people can highlight and organize quotes and thoughts from the web, and access other like-minded people’s learning.