Wells (Respondent) v Devani (Appellant) - uksc-2016-0223-judgment.pdf
www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2016-0223-judgment.pdf
1 Users
0 Comments
2 Highlights
0 Notes
Tags
Top Highlights
Mr Wells contended first, that he had never entered into a binding contract to engage Mr Devani as his agent because the terms of any agreement between them were too uncertain
The question whether there was a binding contract between Mr Devani and Mr Wells required a consideration of what was communicated between them by their words and their conduct and whether, objectively assessed, that led to the conclusion that they intended to create a legally binding relationship and that they had agreed all the terms that the law requires as essential for that purpose
Ready to highlight and find good content?
Glasp is a social web highlighter that people can highlight and organize quotes and thoughts from the web, and access other like-minded people’s learning.